Outline thesis: The dangers of the online world shared by the
author are exaggerated to gain online readership.
Idea 1. Government collecting Data
-For the many ordinary citizens who go about their daily lives,
the government monitoring your online activities should not alarm you. Most of
us have little to hide. Why would what online games you play, the items you buy
online, the content you put up on forums,
As long as
the government uses these information gathered in a respectable manner, most of
us should not be alarmed. After all, this data is meant to combat crimes/
However, some will cry an invasion of privacy. I argue that
privacy is not intruded as the actual person monitoring your online behaviour
has no physical connection to you, and has and will never come into contact
with you or anyone you know. He/she is as good as non-existent to you.
Idea 2. How sensitive is the data you have access too actually?
-Information that we make online poses a threat to us is a point,
which is heavily dramatized.
How many of us works in key installations such as a nuclear power
plant or leading research and development departments where what we work on is
so sensitive such that there are hackers constantly plotting and stalking these
company’s employees to try exploit some information that might inadvertently be
revealed. Even in these companies the management would properly brief its
employees how to handle such data, thus preventing such leaks.
For the rest of us common man, sure that there has been reports
and instances that hackers have gained access into the company network by enticing
employees to click onto links which automatically downloads a virus. But if we
take a look at what we are working on, how much of what we have there can be
useful to a particular someone else, and would even justify a capable
professional hacker to extract that information out on your folly?
Idea 3.
Finally, the author talks about the consequence of oversharing.
Emm uses the example of a boss reading an employees facebook page, a story we
all are too familiar with. However, how much of this is actually applicable in
our lives? To the minority who enjoy such a life of late night parties and take
part in questionable content which they might want to avoid their boss seeing,
even fewer from these group are foolish enough to make such information
available to their colleagues and bosses. This problem surely plagues a special
few.
The summary part is quite good. The whole article is well-organised, and also attractive. Language is fluent. Author can use some real life examples in this response. What's more, author use some question sentence in article to make his points more convincing. Generally, this article is really good.
ReplyDelete